Ver JSON completo
{
"content_url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eng_Foong_Ho_v_Attorney-General",
"extract": "Eng Foong Ho v Attorney-General was a 2009 judgment of the Court of Appeal of Singapore, on appeal from a 2008 decision of the High Court. The main issue raised by the case was whether the Collector of Land Revenue had treated the plaintiffs, who were devotees of the Jin Long Si Temple, unequally by compulsorily acquiring for public purposes the land on which the temple stood but not the lands of a Hindu mission and a Christian church nearby. It was alleged that the authorities had acted in violation of Article 12(1) of the Constitution of the Republic of Singapore, which guarantees the rights to equality before the law and equal protection of the law.",
"language": "en",
"normalizedtitle": "Eng Foong Ho v Attorney-General",
"page_title": "Eng_Foong_Ho_v_Attorney-General",
"pageid": 30505279,
"raw": {
"pages": [
{
"content_urls": {
"desktop": {
"edit": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eng_Foong_Ho_v_Attorney-General?action=edit",
"page": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eng_Foong_Ho_v_Attorney-General",
"revisions": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eng_Foong_Ho_v_Attorney-General?action=history",
"talk": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Eng_Foong_Ho_v_Attorney-General"
},
"mobile": {
"edit": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eng_Foong_Ho_v_Attorney-General?action=edit",
"page": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eng_Foong_Ho_v_Attorney-General",
"revisions": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:History/Eng_Foong_Ho_v_Attorney-General",
"talk": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Eng_Foong_Ho_v_Attorney-General"
}
},
"description": "Singapore legal judgement",
"description_source": "local",
"dir": "ltr",
"displaytitle": "\u003ci\u003eEng Foong Ho v Attorney-General\u003c/i\u003e",
"extract": "Eng Foong Ho v Attorney-General was a 2009 judgment of the Court of Appeal of Singapore, on appeal from a 2008 decision of the High Court. The main issue raised by the case was whether the Collector of Land Revenue had treated the plaintiffs, who were devotees of the Jin Long Si Temple, unequally by compulsorily acquiring for public purposes the land on which the temple stood but not the lands of a Hindu mission and a Christian church nearby. It was alleged that the authorities had acted in violation of Article 12(1) of the Constitution of the Republic of Singapore, which guarantees the rights to equality before the law and equal protection of the law.",
"extract_html": "\u003cp\u003e\u003ci\u003e\u003cb\u003eEng Foong Ho v Attorney-General\u003c/b\u003e\u003c/i\u003e was a 2009 judgment of the Court of Appeal of Singapore, on appeal from a 2008 decision of the High Court. The main issue raised by the case was whether the Collector of Land Revenue had treated the plaintiffs, who were devotees of the Jin Long Si Temple, unequally by compulsorily acquiring for public purposes the land on which the temple stood but not the lands of a Hindu mission and a Christian church nearby. It was alleged that the authorities had acted in violation of Article 12(1) of the Constitution of the Republic of Singapore, which guarantees the rights to equality before the law and equal protection of the law.\u003c/p\u003e",
"lang": "en",
"namespace": {
"id": 0,
"text": ""
},
"normalizedtitle": "Eng Foong Ho v Attorney-General",
"originalimage": {
"height": 585,
"source": "https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/b/b7/SupremeCourtBuilding-Singapore-20070210.jpg",
"width": 1024
},
"pageid": 30505279,
"revision": "1331957068",
"thumbnail": {
"height": 189,
"source": "https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/b/b7/SupremeCourtBuilding-Singapore-20070210.jpg/330px-SupremeCourtBuilding-Singapore-20070210.jpg",
"width": 330
},
"tid": "a9ef3ab8-ed09-11f0-9daa-ac374d6006ca",
"timestamp": "2026-01-09T03:17:01Z",
"title": "Eng_Foong_Ho_v_Attorney-General",
"titles": {
"canonical": "Eng_Foong_Ho_v_Attorney-General",
"display": "\u003ci\u003eEng Foong Ho v Attorney-General\u003c/i\u003e",
"normalized": "Eng Foong Ho v Attorney-General"
},
"type": "standard",
"wikibase_item": "Q5377368"
},
{
"content_urls": {
"desktop": {
"edit": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Court_of_Appeal_of_Singapore?action=edit",
"page": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Court_of_Appeal_of_Singapore",
"revisions": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Court_of_Appeal_of_Singapore?action=history",
"talk": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Court_of_Appeal_of_Singapore"
},
"mobile": {
"edit": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Court_of_Appeal_of_Singapore?action=edit",
"page": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Court_of_Appeal_of_Singapore",
"revisions": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:History/Court_of_Appeal_of_Singapore",
"talk": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Court_of_Appeal_of_Singapore"
}
},
"coordinates": {
"lat": 1.29055556,
"lon": 103.85055556
},
"description": "Supreme appellate court of Singapore",
"description_source": "local",
"dir": "ltr",
"displaytitle": "\u003cspan lang=\"en\" dir=\"ltr\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"mw-page-title-main\"\u003eCourt of Appeal of Singapore\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e",
"extract": "The Court of Appeal of Singapore (SGCA) is the highest court in the judicial system of Singapore. It is the upper division of the Supreme Court of Singapore, the lower being the High Court (which since 2021 has itself been sub-divided into a General Division and an Appellate Division). The Court of Appeal consists of the chief justice, who is the president of the Court, and the judges of the Court of Appeal. The chief justice may ask judges of the High Court to sit as members of the Court of Appeal to hear particular cases. The seat of the Court of Appeal is the Supreme Court Building.",
"extract_html": "\u003cp\u003eThe \u003cb\u003eCourt of Appeal of Singapore\u003c/b\u003e \u003cb\u003e(SGCA)\u003c/b\u003e is the highest court in the judicial system of Singapore. It is the upper division of the Supreme Court of Singapore, the lower being the High Court (which since 2021 has itself been sub-divided into a General Division and an Appellate Division). The Court of Appeal consists of the chief justice, who is the president of the Court, and the judges of the Court of Appeal. The chief justice may ask judges of the High Court to sit as members of the Court of Appeal to hear particular cases. The seat of the Court of Appeal is the Supreme Court Building.\u003c/p\u003e",
"lang": "en",
"namespace": {
"id": 0,
"text": ""
},
"normalizedtitle": "Court of Appeal of Singapore",
"originalimage": {
"height": 585,
"source": "https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/b/b7/SupremeCourtBuilding-Singapore-20070210.jpg",
"width": 1024
},
"pageid": 3279480,
"revision": "1334562871",
"thumbnail": {
"height": 189,
"source": "https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/b/b7/SupremeCourtBuilding-Singapore-20070210.jpg/330px-SupremeCourtBuilding-Singapore-20070210.jpg",
"width": 330
},
"tid": "7e6c6dfa-f8fb-11f0-aea7-8fe9ee70b249",
"timestamp": "2026-01-24T08:05:49Z",
"title": "Court_of_Appeal_of_Singapore",
"titles": {
"canonical": "Court_of_Appeal_of_Singapore",
"display": "\u003cspan lang=\"en\" dir=\"ltr\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"mw-page-title-main\"\u003eCourt of Appeal of Singapore\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e",
"normalized": "Court of Appeal of Singapore"
},
"type": "standard",
"wikibase_item": "Q14874268"
},
{
"content_urls": {
"desktop": {
"edit": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Equality_before_the_law?action=edit",
"page": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Equality_before_the_law",
"revisions": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Equality_before_the_law?action=history",
"talk": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Equality_before_the_law"
},
"mobile": {
"edit": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Equality_before_the_law?action=edit",
"page": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Equality_before_the_law",
"revisions": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:History/Equality_before_the_law",
"talk": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Equality_before_the_law"
}
},
"description": "Judicial principle",
"description_source": "local",
"dir": "ltr",
"displaytitle": "\u003cspan lang=\"en\" dir=\"ltr\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"mw-page-title-main\"\u003eEquality before the law\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e",
"extract": "Equality before the law, known as equality under the law, equality in the eyes of the law, legal equality, or legal egalitarianism, is the principle that all people must be equally protected by the law. The principle requires a systematic rule of law that observes due process to provide equal justice and requires equal protection ensuring that no individual nor group of individuals is privileged over others by the law. Also called the principle of isonomy, it arises from various philosophical questions concerning equality, fairness and justice. Equality before the law is one of the basic principles of some definitions of liberalism. The principle of equality before the law is incompatible with and does not exist within systems incorporating legal slavery, servitude, colonialism, oligarchy, aristocracy, or absolute monarchy.",
"extract_html": "\u003cp\u003e\u003cb\u003eEquality before the law\u003c/b\u003e, known as \u003cb\u003eequality under the law\u003c/b\u003e, \u003cb\u003eequality in the eyes of the law\u003c/b\u003e, \u003cb\u003elegal equality\u003c/b\u003e, or \u003cb\u003elegal egalitarianism\u003c/b\u003e, is the principle that all people must be equally protected by the law. The principle requires a systematic rule of law that observes due process to provide equal justice and requires equal protection ensuring that no individual nor group of individuals is privileged over others by the law. Also called the principle of isonomy, it arises from various philosophical questions concerning equality, fairness and justice. Equality before the law is one of the basic principles of some definitions of liberalism. The principle of equality before the law is incompatible with and does not exist within systems incorporating legal slavery, servitude, colonialism, oligarchy, aristocracy, or absolute monarchy.\u003c/p\u003e",
"lang": "en",
"namespace": {
"id": 0,
"text": ""
},
"normalizedtitle": "Equality before the law",
"originalimage": {
"height": 2108,
"source": "https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/f/fc/Graffiti_Cape_Town.jpg",
"width": 2984
},
"pageid": 3492548,
"revision": "1358577614",
"thumbnail": {
"height": 233,
"source": "https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/f/fc/Graffiti_Cape_Town.jpg/330px-Graffiti_Cape_Town.jpg",
"width": 330
},
"tid": "286a1333-641f-11f1-92be-fab33444b81d",
"timestamp": "2026-06-09T16:20:41Z",
"title": "Equality_before_the_law",
"titles": {
"canonical": "Equality_before_the_law",
"display": "\u003cspan lang=\"en\" dir=\"ltr\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"mw-page-title-main\"\u003eEquality before the law\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e",
"normalized": "Equality before the law"
},
"type": "standard",
"wikibase_item": "Q316254"
}
],
"text": "In Eng Foong Ho v Attorney-General, the Court of Appeal of Singapore held that equality before the law was satisfied by a \"reasonable nexus\" between state action and the object of the law.",
"year": 2009
},
"text": "In Eng Foong Ho v Attorney-General, the Court of Appeal of Singapore held that equality before the law was satisfied by a \"reasonable nexus\" between state action and the object of the law.",
"thumbnail": "https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/b/b7/SupremeCourtBuilding-Singapore-20070210.jpg/330px-SupremeCourtBuilding-Singapore-20070210.jpg",
"type": "selected",
"year": 2009
}
